I read the article twice. It has the "breathless" tone of some kind of expose, but there's no "there" there.
That's what Bill Clinton does. He networks with government leaders and business leaders to raise money for his Foundation that does stuff like fight HIV/AIDS in Africa. So what? Where's the beef?
Or are we supposed to be all upset because he travelled to Kazhikstan? Again, so what?
As near as I can tell, the main complaint in Van Natta's hit job is that Bill Clinton spends time travelling with a very well respected (and very wealthy) business leader who has donated $130 million towards fighting AIDS in Africa and Tsunami relief. Well, duh!
Guess what? Bill Clinton spends time with Warren Buffett and Bill Gates and Al Gore too.
