The small bit of your comment that I understand (the second paragraph needs some clarification) --

That's sort of my point...  I don't care if you read the evidence here or at DK.

The fact is - the 'signal' (truly pro-HRC) to 'noise' (Obama hitjobs) ratio is laughably skewed towards the noise.

Hell... look at your own history.  Look at the diary list.  Look at the rec'ed diaries.

The "pro-Hillary" content is laughably miniscule.  The "anti-Obama" content is ruling the roost and has been for more than a month.